There is documented evidence that John Pring, editor of Disability News Service (DNS), has faced institutional pushback—particularly from the UK government’s Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)—but claims of a broader media-wide blacklisting are more nuanced.
🛑 Government Blacklisting by the DWP
- In 2015, the DWP refused to respond to any questions from John Pring or DNS, effectively blacklisting him from official comment. This was reportedly due to his persistent investigations into benefit-related deaths and the department’s internal reviews.
- The National reported that Pring had uncovered the first suicide case directly linked to welfare cuts and that the DWP ceased communication after he published stories without their delayed responses.
- A coalition of disability rights groups and public figures—including MPs and academics—publicly condemned the DWP’s actions, calling them discriminatory and a threat to press freedom.
📰 Mainstream Media Coverage
- While Pring’s work is widely respected in disability rights circles, mainstream British media outlets have rarely featured his investigations. This absence has been noted by disability activists, especially given the gravity of the issues he covers—such as deaths linked to welfare assessments and systemic discrimination.
- For example, The Mirror launched a disability-focused series in 2022 that included Pring’s contributions, but later published a controversial column undermining disabled benefit claimants. This led to criticism that the platform was tokenizing disabled voices while allowing harmful narratives to persist.
📚 Broader Context
- Pring’s recent book The Department compiles years of investigative reporting on the DWP and has been distributed to every UK MP. Despite this, it received limited mainstream media attention, reinforcing concerns about marginalization of his work.
So while there’s clear evidence of blacklisting by the DWP, the claim that he’s been systematically blackballed by the entire mainstream media is harder to prove—but the lack of amplification of his reporting by major outlets certainly raises questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment