Does the Bank Surveillance Bill violate Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998?

Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 protects the right to respect for private and family life, home, and correspondence. This right can be interfered with by public authorities only if it is lawful, necessary, and proportionate to achieve a legitimate aim, such as national security, public safety, or the prevention of crime. The Bank Surveillance Bill, as described in the article, raises concerns about potential breaches of Article 8 due to its surveillance measures. The key issue is whether the surveillance is proportionate and necessary for the intended purpose. If the surveillance measures are deemed excessive or not justified by a legitimate aim, they could be considered a breach of Article 8. For a more detailed analysis, it would be essential to examine the specific provisions of the bill and how they align with the principles of necessity and proportionality under Article 8. : [CCTV and the Human Rights Act](https://www.touchstar-atc.com/blog/humanrightsact) : [State Surveillance and the Right to Privacy](https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3394) : [Article 8: Respect for your private and family life](https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/human-rights/human-rights-act/article-8-respect-your-private-and-family-life)