Requesting that MPs vote against the assisted dying bill to protect the most vulnerable in our society

In the halls of Parliament, a decision to be made, A bill on assisted dying, where the stakes are high and grave. But think of the vulnerable, the voices left unheard, The ones who fear coercion, their cries lost in the word. Let's stand for the voiceless, the ones who can't defend, Against a law that might push them to an untimely end. For dignity in living, not just in the final breath, Let's vote against this bill, and protect life 'til death. The elderly and disabled, those who suffer pain, Deserve our care and comfort, not a law that might constrain. What if the pressure's subtle, a whisper in the night, To choose a path they wouldn't, if they had the strength to fight? Let's stand for the voiceless, the ones who can't defend, Against a law that might push them to an untimely end. For dignity in living, not just in the final breath, Let's vote against this bill, and protect life 'til death. We must ensure compassion, in every choice we make, To guard the weak and weary, for every life’s at stake. So let’s provide the support, the care that they deserve, And vote against this bill, for the lives we must preserve. Let's stand for the voiceless, the ones who can't defend, Against a law that might push them to an untimely end. For dignity in living, not just in the final breath, Let's vote against this bill, and protect life 'til death. For every life is precious, in every single way, Let's choose to stand together, and keep the fears at bay. Vote against this bill, let’s make our voices heard, For the sake of all the vulnerable, let’s protect them with our word.

The 'slippery slope' argument against assisted dying

The "slippery slope" argument against assisted dying posits that legalizing assisted dying could lead to unintended and potentially harmful consequences. Here are some key points to consider: Broadening Eligibility: Initially, assisted dying might be limited to those with terminal illnesses. Over time, however, criteria could expand to include individuals with chronic illnesses, disabilities, or mental health conditions. This broadening could lead to vulnerable populations feeling pressured to choose assisted dying. Erosion of Trust: The trust between patients and healthcare providers could be eroded. Patients might fear that doctors will recommend assisted dying as a viable option when other treatments are available. This could undermine the fundamental role of healthcare providers to heal and care. Societal Pressure: Legalizing assisted dying might create societal pressure on the elderly, disabled, or chronically ill individuals to end their lives to avoid being a burden on their families or the healthcare system. This pressure could distort the voluntary nature of the decision. Moral and Ethical Concerns: The ethical landscape of medicine is built on the principle of "do no harm." Introducing assisted dying challenges this principle and could lead to ethical dilemmas where the value of life becomes subjective, based on quality of life judgments. Safeguard Erosion: While initial laws might have strict safeguards, there is a risk that these could be eroded over time, making it easier for misuse or abuse to occur. This erosion could lead to cases where individuals are assisted in dying without thorough consideration of all other options and supports. These points illustrate how the slippery slope argument reflects concerns about the long-term societal, ethical, and medical implications of legalizing assisted dying.